Welfare :: essays research papers

WelfareIn the recent February article of the Los Angeles Times, Clinton hasannounced to go on with a plan to religious service people of welfare. Clinton challengedcorporate bosses five months ago to take people in from welfare and trained them.One of the main contributors of the project is a chief decision maker officerof the Monsanto Ca., the nations fourth largest chemical maker. Clintonsingled come forward the Monsanto company and other companies for helping out welfareworkers. Monsanto has hired five recipient and found almost cardinal much jobs forothers.Under the new laws of the welfare reforms, the sufficient body workers shouldwork within the two years of recieving benefits. Some of the good things out ofthis plan is that by the year 2005, only 14% of jobs will be done by more of thedependent poor people. This is bad because 46% of aid recipients had not realised high school or earned a General Equivalency Diploma. The ability toabsorb more welfare recipients is limit ed by the high- technology chemical,agricultural, fiber and pharmaceutic development and manufacturing. Theseworkers would have limited skills. Monsanto is highly protecteive of the privacyof its special new hires. The new employees are hired to fill a variety ofclerical and promiscuous general- labor positions. They will not be identified as thecompanys welfare-to-work initiative.The possible short-term effect this would have on society is that people,on welfare, would be able to work and get paid for it. This will allow them tobe able to build finance of their own that they will be able to help them withtheir lives. The long-term effect, though it seemed good for the people, wouldbe bad for everyone else who werent on welfare. This would be because thepeople working off welfare would really be working off the appraise payers money. So,the people who arent living off welfare would be paying higher taxes and thepeople who are living on welfare would be paying little taxes.Educat ionEducation is an important factor in society today. Without education, wewouldnt be able to boost our technology. Boosting the technology would thenhelp us in the aesculapian field, help us build better houses that are more durableto earthquakes, etc. I think that we should spend more of the budget oneducation.If we spended more on education, we would be able to get more, betterteacher to teach our children. With more teachers on the field, we would beable to teach more students than normal. To help the teachers out in there